Monday, March 30, 2015

One third of Taiwanese youth hope to work in China: poll

One third of Taiwanese youth hope to work in China: poll

2015/03/29 12:29:14

Taipei, March 29 (CNA) Nearly one third of Taiwanese aged under 40 are hoping to find a job in China due to potentially higher salaries and greater room for career development, a survey from cable television channel TVBS has found.

According to the survey conducted by the production team of the TVBS program "Understanding China," 34 percent of Taiwan's young men and women belonging to the 20-29 age bracket would choose to work in China rather than find a job in their home market, while the percentage for the 30-39 age bracket stands at 32 percent. It fell to 22 percent for the 40-49 age group.

As high as 56 percent of respondents aged 20-29 believed they would receive a relatively higher salary in China compared to Taiwan, while 53 percent thought they would see more opportunities in China for career development, the survey revealed.

Overall, in the 20-49 age bracket, more than half the respondents agreed that they would earn more and have more potential for career development if they obtained a job in China.

The survey, however, also pointed out that 56 percent of Taiwan's youth thought that their Chinese peers were more competitive than they are in China's employment market.

The telephone survey of Taiwanese people aged between 20-49 was carried out from March 24-25, with 819 valid samples. It had a confidence level of 95 percent, with a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points.

(By Flor Wang)
enditem/JR

Friday, March 27, 2015

Commercial Times: Potential worries despite improved jobless rate

Commercial Times: Potential worries despite improved jobless rate

2015/03/27 18:56:07

Taiwan's jobless rate in February dropped to 3.69 percent, falling for the sixth consecutive month and reaching the lowest monthly level in nearly 15 years.

It was almost at the same level as in 2001 during Taiwan's first change of government. Despite the improvement, however, few people were elated, and the reasons for that should be explored.

Prior to 2001, Taiwan's jobless remained under 2 percent, often below that of the other three Asian Tigers -- Hong Kong, Singapore and South Korea -- and Japan.

Many local people might have forgotten the good old days because over the past decade, Taiwan has had the highest unemployment among the four Asian Tigers.

Shortly after Taiwan's first change of government, the Internet bubble burst and unemployment in Taiwan surged to over 5 percent.

After the country's second change of government in 2008, Taiwan's jobless rate rose above 6 percent due to the global financial crisis.

Although unemployment dropped to 3.96 percent last year in Taiwan, it was still the highest among the four Asian Tigers.

While Taiwan's job market has improved, wage growth is lower than a decade ago and job quality has also changed.

We must point out four potential areas of concern in Taiwan's job market.

First is the high percentage of people unemployed over the long term. Prior to 2001, the number of people who were out of work for more than a year in Taiwan remained around 30,000, but the number has been climbing every year since then due to changes in the industrial structure.

Last year, the number of long-term jobless people was 75,000, accounting for 16.4 percent of the total number of unemployed and a 10 percent increase from a decade ago.

Second, the number of people affected by unemployment in households has increased sharply. Prior to 2001, no matter how the economy performed, the number of people affected by unemployment in households was about 600,000 at most.

Now, even with a jobless rate of under 4 percent last year, and the lowest monthly rate in February in 15 years, some 800,000 people are affected by unemployment in their households.

Third, the labor participation rate in Taiwan is lower than in neighboring countries, a situation that is attributed to lower participation rates among middle-aged and older men.

For example, among Taiwanese men 50-54 years old, the labor participation rate is 82 percent, compared with 90 percent in the other three Asian Tiger economies.

In the 55-59 age group, the labor participation rate in Taiwan is 68 percent, compared with between 80 and 90 percent among the other three Asian Tigers.

Taiwan's low labor participation rate could be attributed to enterprises forcing workers to retire and the government offering civil servants generous retirement packages.

The fourth worry is the widening gap between the wages of blue- collar and white-collar workers over the past two decades.

For example, white-collar workers in Taiwan received an average monthly salary of NT$44,777 in 1994, about 1.55 times of NT$28,990 earned by blue-collar workers. In 2014, however, the average white-collar wage was NT$63,432 per month, or 1.7 times that of blue-collar workers at NT$37,858.

This is because the jobs created over the past years have been mostly in the service, wholesale and retail, hotel and catering industries, which generally offer lower wages.

The Executive Yuan should assemble a task force to address the above problems. (Editorial Abstract -- March 27, 2015)

(By Lilian Wu)
Enditem/pc

Thursday, March 26, 2015

South Korean workers continue protest

South Korean workers continue protest

’DISMISSAL IS MURDER’:Protesters demanded a meeting with Yeung Foong Yu Group chairman Ho Shou-chuan, and demonstrated outside his house in Taipei

By Lii Wen  /  Staff reporter

Workers from South Korean manufacturer Hydis protest outside the Ministry of Labor in Taipei on Tuesday. The workers have asked that the ministry intervene in E Ink Holdings Inc’s decision to close its factories in Korea.

Photo: Chang Chia-ming, Taipei Times

Union representatives from South Korea’s Hydis Technologies, a subsidiary of Taiwanese e-paper manufacturer E Ink Holdings, yesterday held a rally in Taipei to protest E Ink’s decision to cease operations in Icheon, South Korea.
Now on their second trip to Taiwan, the South Korean workers have staged a series of demonstrations over the past week, expressing stiff opposition toward E Ink’s plans to dismiss more than 350 Hydis employees by the end of this month.
They said that it was against South Korean labor regulations for a profitable company to implement a mass layoff of its employees, adding that Hydis made more than NT$2.8 billion (US$89.81 million) last year from its patent royalties in fringe field switching — a key technology in the LCD electronics industry.
Union representatives accused E Ink of following in the footsteps of China’s BOE Technology, which was accused of industrial espionage during its ownership of Hydis from 2003 to 2006.
Despite rainy weather, dozens of activists from Taiwanese unions joined yesterday’s demonstration to express solidarity with their South Korean counterparts.
The workers demanded a meeting with Ho Shou-chuan (何壽川), the chairman of Yeung Foong Yu Group — of which E Ink is an affiliate — after they failed to reach consensus with E Ink management during previous negotiations.
Wearing the all-white cleanroom suits that are usually worn by assembly line workers in the high-tech industry, the South Korean workers chanted slogans in Mandarin Chinese and Korean, demanding that Ho address their demands.
Halfway through the march, the workers staged a demonstration outside Ho’s house, saying that Ho and other Yeung Foong Yu Group board members repeatedly ignored their demands to engage in negotiations.
Worker Lee Mi-ok, 30, said she has worked at Hydis for more than a decade, after she was forced to terminate her college studies to provide for her family.
“After my father passed away, the burden of my family’s livelihood fell on my shoulders,” she said through an interpreter. “My mother is a strong, resilient woman. When I think about her example, I tell myself that I need to stand firm, too.”
Although E Ink said it provided favorable severance packages to the laid-off employees, the workers said that they were more interested in retaining their jobs.
“In South Korea we have a saying: ‘Dismissal is murder,’” Hydis union leader Woo Boo-ki said through an interpreter, adding that both he and his wife relied on their jobs at Hydis for their income.
In a demonstration in front of the Yeung Foong Yu Group headquarters on Tuesday, Woo and Park Ju-mun, leader of a regional union organization in South Korea’s Gyeonggi Province, had their heads shaved to protest against the shutdowns.
Chung Fu-chi (鍾馥吉), president of the employees’ union of Bank Sinopac — also a Yeung Foong Yu Group affiliate — attended the rally to express his support for the South Korean workers, saying that union organizations should stand in unity regardless of nationality.
In a statement earlier this week, E Ink said its multiyear efforts to improve the financial conditions of the company have failed and accused union representatives of “spreading rumors.”

Wednesday, March 25, 2015

Activists set to launch Social Democratic Party

Activists set to launch Social Democratic Party

By Lii Wen  /  Staff reporter

Wed, Feb 18, 2015 - Page 3

Veteran social activists intend to introduce a new center-left political party — the Social Democratic Party (SDP, 社會民主黨) — in next year’s legislative elections.
Led by National Taiwan University professor Fan Yun (范雲), the party is to officially announce its bid to enter the race by early next month.
“We differ from current prevailing methods of economic development, which often expect a certain industry to act as a ‘locomotive of growth’ for other sectors,” SDP founding member and potential legislative candidate Urda Yen (嚴婉玲) said, adding that the party supports the development of industries that address the current needs of society — such as long-term care for the elderly or clean energy generation.
Yen was previously spokesperson for the Economic Democracy Union, a group that originated in early campaigns against the cross-strait service trade agreement that preceded the Sunflower movement last year.
In terms of cross-strait issues, the SDP considers Taiwan an independent nation separate from China and would focus its platform on economic issues and social equality, Yen said.
Fan has been confirmed as a candidate for legislator next year, while Yen and National Chung Cheng University academic Chen Shang-chih (陳尚志) are considering candidacy, Yen said.
While Fan is likely to enter the race in Taipei’s Daan District (大安), Yen is considering running for legislator in New Taipei City’s Banciao District (板橋).
The move would pit Yen against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) incumbent Lin Hung-chih (林鴻池), who spearheaded the KMT’s efforts last year to promote the trade pact.
Amid an explosion of candidates from minor parties for next year’s elections, the SDP is engaged in discussions with the environmental issue-based Green Party about a joint legislator-at-large nomination list, Yen said.
Although the SDP does not rule out cooperation with major parties — such as possible coordination with the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to avoid nominating candidates in the same constituency — they are “most likely” to cooperate with the Green Party in terms of nominating joint candidates, she added.
The upcoming political party is to feature a rose — an international symbol for socialism — in its official emblem, Yen said.
The rose is to be rainbow-colored instead of solid red to illustrate the party’s roots in a diverse range of progressive social causes — including women’s rights, children’s rights, gay rights and media reform — instead of being strictly limited to left-wing labor movements, she added.
The party is set to be the second founded by members of the civic group Taiwan Citizen’s Union (TCU), after a separate group of TCU members launched the New Power Party less than a month ago.
In addition to the four major parties that hold seats in the national legislature, up to 10 minor parties — many with progressive or activist agendas — are planning to enter the race, which is scheduled for January next year.

Tuesday, March 24, 2015

IWW in Taiwan: The First Year

 The Taiwan initiative of the IWW has been coming to terms with the political situation in Taiwan. There is a tug-of-war here between Chinese and American influences that captivates the youth of the island and distracts them from the basic problem: a paucity of good jobs, all at low pay, all without union protection.


Organizing for the One Big Union in Taiwan has been an education since I was made a delegate in September 2013 and entrusted with the goal of starting a Regional Organizing Committee (ROC) in Asia based in Taiwan.
With referrals From GST Sam, I sought out and met two young college students who were signed up by the Perth, Australia branch. In addition, I was referred to an interested education worker in Northern Taiwan who referred me to another interested worker in Southern Taiwan. I traveled from my central location to meet both men and issue Red Cards. In addition, I contacted an activist friend I had met ten years earlier who introduced me to student activists that worked in his café. They were not interested in starting a union and the two activists from Perth didn’t show their Red Cards. The education workers paid one month dues and ceased contact. The organizing campaign reached a dead end.  
In Taiwan, despite low wages stuck at a sixteen year old rate, overwork, and unsafe working conditions, both older and younger workers are reluctant to organize into unions. The older workers lived through a brutal thirty-seven years of martial law from the U.S. supported dictatorship. The younger workers grew up with neo-liberal two-party market capitalism where independent unions were restricted. The ruling class embedded sweetheart unions with special privileges as a way of controlling the work force, stifling labor unrest, and insuring voter sympathy. 
Student activism falls into two basic camps; pro-China or laissez-faire U.S. influence. There is a small group of student activists leaning towards Taiwan independence. Unionism equals radical communism because of fear-mongering from propaganda against a China take-over or U.S. anti-worker capitalism. Pro-China student activists condemn the WTO and sweatshops but generally don’t see clear to support union solidarity as a remedy. Other students have bourgeois tendencies.
Where does that leave the pro-union anarcho-syndicalism of the IWW in Taiwan? Even less than the IWW in the U.S. has been able to influence the Occupy Wall Street movement because of the split camps of pro-China and pro U.S. For many bad reasons, old and young oppressed workers in Taiwan cannot or will not make the connection that organizing themselves in their workplace is the only way to start addressing the dilemma of top-down management.
A delegate for the IWW should organize with his fellow workers his or her own work place. As a teacher of English as a Foreign Language, I am faced with the handicap of organizing a transient workforce of ex-pats who rarely stay on the job long enough to organize. Another problem I have as a delegate of the IWW in Taiwan is that I am a sixty-year-old immigrant of European descent; there is prejudice and suspicion about me. Even though I speak Mandarin Chinese, I am still seen as an outsider by most Taiwanese. An organizer who is indigenous to Taiwan stands a better chance of being successful here. There are many handicaps we must overcome before a Regional Organizing Committee can take hold in Taiwan and Asia.


 Speaking at Wisteria Tea House in Taipei workshop:"How to Start a Teachers' Union." 

It will be very difficult to succeed in promoting organizing workers in Taiwan and Asia without indigenous delegates. To address the issues inhibiting union solidarity and organizing in Taiwan, your delegate proposes to do the following:
1.     Find a Taiwanese group or political party to bore into that will appreciate the goals of the IWW union organizing effort.
2.     Continue promoting the OBU on the internet in www.taIWWan.blogspot.tw digest of worker actions in Taiwan. I have received over eight thousand hits worldwide.
3.     Continue the community Facebook page of taIWWan. We have over eight hundred friends supporting our efforts worldwide.
4.     Post to local Facebook pages articles that will raise the consciousness of English speaking workers here in hopes of building a support group to form an ROC.
5.     Continue offering free workshops on “How to Start Your Own Union.”
6.     Continue offering a free progressive lending library to the community.
7.     Promote my website www.readingsandridings.jimdo.com where readers can access my proletarian creative writing and blogs, including www.iww.org
8.     Keep GHQ informed of developments in Taiwan IWW organizing, receive and follow up on referrals from GHQ of fellow workers in the Asian/Taiwan theatre.

Most importantly to our organizing campaign here is finding indigenous fellow workers willing to organize themselves and fellow workers into a union with the IWW. As it is illegal to organize a union without thirty workers in a shop and approval from the Ministry of Labor, clandestine union organizing campaigns must be stressed. Your delegate must be able to meet indigenous workers with fire and guts to improve their working conditions and compensation at the grass root level and to grieve unfair labor practices. I believe this can be done.
The following issues act as obstructions to union organizing in Taiwan:
1.     Minimum wage is to low; there is no living-wage.
2.     Tipping is prohibited or collected and kept by the boss.
3.     Overtime work is not compensated in family businesses; rules are not enforced.
4.      Year-end bonuses are used to entrap workers into compliance with unfair workplace conditions.
5.     Only government approved unions may be organized.
6.     A workplace must have at least 30 employees to file to unionize.
7.     Hooligans harass workers attempting to unionize.
8.     Ex-pat worker community is transient; foreigners may not unionize or participate in public demonstrations or face deportation. 



At the end of 2013, it seemed possible to establish an R.O.C. in Taiwan; I had signed up two American residents, we had the two Taiwanese members who had joined in Perth, Australia and they had brought two more interested activists to the two monthly meetings I held in Taipei. In addition, I had visited with my old activist friend and met the college student activists who were working at his café. Then reality hit. The two Taiwanese who joined in Perth never showed their Red Cards or paid dues. Their comrades were in a China unification group and not interested in grass root organizing. My old activist friend was working for the neo-liberal Democratic Progress Party (DPP) and not interested in labor union organizing, either. By February 2014, it became clear to me that forming an R.O.C. wasn’t going to be that easy.

In March, 2014, hundreds of students and demonstrators occupied the legislative chamber in Taipei. One of the leading speakers was the young man introduced to me by my old activist friend a few months earlier. As thousands of supporters gathered on the streets outside the chamber, the leaders of the so-called “Sunflower Movement” outlined their demands:

“We do not want to see young people still living on a NT$22,000 salary (Note: *32 Taiwan dollars = $1.00 U.S. dollar)10 years from now,” the statement read. “In the future, Taiwanese small and medium-sized enterprises will face challenges from competition with Chinese-invested companies that have abundant capital and use vertically integrated business models,” it said. The demonstration was against a Taiwan-China service trade pact.

The protesters ignored the exploitation already existent in Taiwan for sixty-seven years since the U.S. began to use the KMT’s “Free China” as a puppet for business and military interests. The DPP used the takeover as a political tool to condemn the ruling class detente with the Chinese government and re-gain power in the Nov. 2014 election. 

This ends my report of IWW and labor activities in Taiwan in 2014.

For One Big Union,
Solidarity,
David Temple
# 347367

Del. # 13-3235

Monday, March 23, 2015

taIWWan 世界工業勞工 TAIWAN IWW LENDING LIBRARY

*           taIWWan   世界工業勞工  taIWWan Regional Organizing Committee
TAIWAN IWW LENDING LIBRARY
All titles english unless indicated

Two month loans  -500nt deposit–
All books CD’s DVD’s returnable to: David temple    

*       The kid’s guide to social action – lewis
*       A TROUBLEMAKERS’ HANDBOOK – LA BOTZ
*       THE POWER IN OUR HANDS – BIGELOW & DIAMOND
*       GREAT BISBEE IWW DEPORTATION 1917 – HANSEN
*       RED SCARE IN COURT – SABIN
*       AN IWW ANTHOLOGY – KERR
*       EUGENE V. DEBS – SALVATORE
*       MOTHER JONES SPEAKS – ED. – FONER
*       LABOR IN ACTION – PARADIS
*       DIE NIGGER DIE! –BROWN
*       OCCUPY! – ED. - TAYLOR & Cessen
*       Freedom in jeopardy (mccarthy years) – HIRSHFELD
*       JOE HILL – SMITH

*       BREAK THEIR HAUGHTY POWER – NELSON
*       CLASS WARFARE – ROCHESTER
*       BLACKBOARD UNIONS – MURPHY
*       WHAT IS THE IWW (PAMPHLET) – NYC GMB
 taIWWan Regional Organizing CommitteeDOWNFALL OF FASCISM IN BLACK ANKLE COUNTY - GILFOND
*       FELLOW WORKER (FRED THOMPSON) - –OEDIGER
*       THE CIVIL WAR IN FRANCE – MARX
*       LA COMMUNE – NATHAN
*       PARIS BABYLON – CHRISTIANSEN
*       10 DAYS THAT SHOOK THE WORLD – REED
*       TERRORISM FOR HUMANITY – HONDERICH
*       THE TALES OF HOFFMAN – ED. – LEVINE
*       ABBIE HOFFMAN (SOON TO BE A MAJOR MOTION PICTURE – HOFFMAN
*       DEBT – DAVID GRAEBER
*       JACK (BIOGRAPHY OF JACK LONDON) – sinclair
*       Sacco & Vanzetti – ed. – davis
*       Communist manifesto – marx & engels
*       Introduction to the labor movement (pamphlet) – N.J. center for economic policy
*       High tech low pay – marcy
*       Fast food nation – schlosser
*       A people’s history of the u.s.  - zinn
*       Robert’s rules- Zimmerman
*       False promises –aronowitz
*       John brown – du bois
*       The wobblies – renshaw
*       Memoirs of a wobbly – mc guckin
*       TaIWWan iww intro– henry (mandarin)

Toll collectors make long march to Executive Yuan

Toll collectors make long march to Executive Yuan

FALSE SECURITY:Activists accused the government of employing between 70,000 and 80,000 people as short-term contractors to cut expenses and skirt labor rights

By Lii Wen  /  Staff reporter

Laid-off freeway toll collectors kneel in unison during a protest procession from the Ministry of Transportation and Communications to the Executive Yuan in Taipei yesterday.

Photo: Lo Pei-der, Taipei Times

More than 300 former freeway toll collectors yesterday took to the streets of Taipei to protest what they said were the Executive Yuan’s unfair accusations toward them and to demand better treatment for short-term government contractors.
The laid-off toll collectors have been engaged in a prolonged campaign since January last year, when the nation implemented a new electronic toll collection system and tore down all tollbooths, rendering them jobless.
In a gesture to express their anguish and despair, the protesters knelt down on the ground after every six steps they took, acting in unison to the beat of a drum for more than an hour throughout the course of the march.
The solemn procession started at the Ministry of Transportation and Communications in Taipei and ended in front of the Executive Yuan, a distance of about 1.5km.
Wearing kneepads and their signature orange T-shirts, the protesters each carried an egg to symbolize the fragile nature of the security offered by government contract jobs.
They accused the ministry of having employed them as short-term contractors every year, despite many of the toll collectors having worked for nearly two decades.
The former toll collectors demanded that the government provide them with severance packages in accordance with their years of service, instead of a fixed seven-month stipend.
Labor activist Kuo Kuan-chun (郭冠均) said the government did little to protect the rights of 70,000 to 80,000 contractors, as contractors often lack job security and severance packages as stipulated by the Labor Standards Act (勞動基準法).
He accused the government of employing short-term contractors to cut down on expenses and to evade its responsibility of protecting labor rights, adding that comprehensive reforms must be enacted to cut down on the number of contractors.
Taiwan International Workers’ Association member Betty Chen (陳容柔) rejected comments made last week by Premier Mao Chi-kuo (毛治國), who said that the government “could not give any more” and that the protesters’ demands would infringe upon the interests of the majority of taxpayers.
“What exactly did you give the workers when you established the regulations on government contractors?” Chen asked, accusing Mao of fostering antagonism between the former toll collectors and the general public.